Schools + Politics + Money = Turmoil, Change, Uncertainty
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Does Money Matter for Schools
Does Money Matter for Schools? There is considerable disagreement in the academic literature about whether raising school expenditure improves educational outcomes. Yet changing the level of resources is one of the key policy levers open to governments. In the UK, school expenditure has increased by about 40 per cent in real terms since 2000. Thus, providing an answer to the question as to whet...
متن کاملPolitics, Markets and America's Schools
Why do the advanced capitalist societies, while thoroughly infused with market institutions and political norms supporting free choice and voluntary exchange, nevertheless provide most educational services throught the state? In our book, Schooling in Capitalist America (Bowles & Gintis, 1976), Samuel Bowles and I argued that this anomaly is easily understood if we interpret schools as fundamen...
متن کاملStarr PoliTiCs in The orBiT of money Paul
their nearly seven-hundred-page volume comprehensive, except that the other two books reveal some of its limitations. Taking a wholly different approach, Jeffrey Winters’s Oligarchy is a comparative historical study ranging from the ancient world to the contemporary United States and focusing on the political power of extreme wealth—what many today think of as the “1 percent,” though what Winte...
متن کاملFollow the Money—The Politics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research
July 2005 | Volume 3 | Issue 7 | e324 German embryonic stem cell scientist Oliver Brustle faces major challenges in his lab on a daily basis that have little to do with science. His country’s policy on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) is among the most restrictive in Europe. Collaborations with other countries are difficult. And he’s overwhelmed by the time and paperwork necessary to comply w...
متن کاملMoney in Judicial Politics: Individual Contributions and Collective Decisions∗
We study how campaign contributions affect the voting strategies and effectiveness of justices in the Supreme Court of eight US states. A judge’s voting strategy leans more heavily towards an interest group the larger are its contributions to the judge, and the smaller are its contributions to other members of the court. This panel effect is consistent with an equilibrium response to contributi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Educational Considerations
سال: 1984
ISSN: 0146-9282
DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1761